I also think that we should keep to support Java EE 6 for some time.

But +1 for dropping Java SE 6 support

2016-03-25 14:00 GMT+01:00 Rudy De Busscher <rdebussc...@gmail.com>:

> All,
>
> Most of my clients still work with Java EE 6 (on Java SE 7), so I think it
> is too early to abandon that version.
>
> +1 for setting compile version to SE 7.
>
> Regards
> Rudy
>
>
> On 25 March 2016 at 13:48, Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > hi @ all,
> >
> > imo the benefit is too limited.
> > cdi 1.1 added some nice parts, but mainly for users.
> > we would just drop the bv-module as well as some parts of the servlet
> > module.
> > the jsf-module already contains optional ee7 support (-> we would just
> get
> > rid of one small workaround).
> > for the rest the benefit is minimal as well (or there won't be a change
> at
> > all).
> > ee7 is great for users and therefore we support it already, however,
> > internally the benefit is too limited and ee6 servers will be around the
> > next few years.
> >
> > -> imo v2 should be based on cdi 2.0 (-> ee8).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-03-25 13:29 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Se 8 is surely too early (~1 year I think). +1 to drop ee6 from master.
> > > Le 25 mars 2016 13:27, "Harald Wellmann" <hwellmann...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit
> > > :
> > >
> > > > Since John raised the question about Java SE 6 support, what about
> Java
> > > EE
> > > > 6?
> > > >
> > > > Dropping support for Java EE 6/CDI 1.0 would simplify the code base
> > > > significantly (a lot more so than moving from Java 1.6 to Java 1.7).
> > > >
> > > > How about starting a new release line DeltaSpike 2.x targeting Java
> EE
> > 7+
> > > > and Java SE 8+, with continued support for Java EE 6 on the 1.x
> branch
> > > for
> > > > as long as people are willing to work on backward compatibility?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Harald
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
GitHub: https://github.com/chkal

Reply via email to