We should add a section that the person who applies the PR to our canonical 
repo have to verify that the PR only contains commits from the contributor 
himself. He basically needs to make sure that the contributor doesn't ship too 
much in the pull request (and thus trashing our code provenance chain).

ASF committers should not use PRs but directly commit to canonical repo 
themselves.
Of course it's fine to showcase ideas etc on github first. But you can simply 
cherry pick that over to master and push that to our repo yourself.

just my .02

txs and LieGrue,
strub





> On Tuesday, 26 July 2016, 1:26, Jason Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1 PRs are much easier to work with, imo.
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Christian Kaltepoth <[email protected]
>>  wrote:
> 
>>  Hey John,
>> 
>>  Great work!
>> 
>>  +1 ;)
>> 
>>  Christian
>> 
>>  2016-07-23 18:14 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>  > Hi John,
>>  >
>>  > Greate job. I think that we really need to have that. It's much 
> more easy
>>  > and cool to work with PR.
>>  > Easy way to review, easy way to fix changes, the contributor does not
>>  need
>>  > to attach a new patch just need to update the PR and we'll have 
> feedbacks
>>  > more fast with PR Builder Plugin and comments by line on PR.
>>  >
>>  > I prefer this way, totally agree with your PR.
>>  >
>>  > +1 :)
>>  >
>>  > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, John D. Ament 
> <[email protected]>
>>  > wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > All,
>>  > >
>>  > > I put together a first pass PR on an improved contributor 
> workflow that
>>  > can
>>  > > leverage github PRs.  This is in addition to our existing patch
>>  approach.
>>  > >
>>  > > You can find the PR here, with the changes:
>>  > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/pull/61/files
>>  > >
>>  > > Using PRs gives us a bit of an advantage:
>>  > >
>>  > > - We don't lose the original author in the commit
>>  > > - We can run automated tests prior to the commit being merged in
>>  > >
>>  > > Please take a look, I'm happy to adjust as needed.  I also 
> took the
>>  > liberty
>>  > > to replace some of the to-be-retired links (e.g. people.a.o is 
> retiring
>>  > > soon, mail archives are being moved to pony, ICLA is now PDF 
> based)
>>  > >
>>  > > John
>>  > >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > --
>>  > Daniel Cunha
>>  > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>  > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>  > http://www.tomitribe.io
>>  >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  --
>>  Christian Kaltepoth
>>  Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
>>  Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>  GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jason Porter
> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
> 

Reply via email to