Good to know. I don't recall he mentioned being subscribed to this mailing list, but he would have to subscribe to post, I suppose.
The current project (whether "device_map" was a legal name on GitHub or not, I trust Bertrand can advise Konstantin) is based on the 1.0.x data, and according to Travis CI makes a stable impression. With its Ruby gems it is fairly self contained even if DeviceMap was to stop exposing 1.x via a URL (the downloads are always there anyway) so I guess everyone involved can figure out, if a 1.x "clients" contribution for Ruby makes sense or wait for 2.x. Werner On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for reference: > > http://s.apache.org/4ES > > Remember, the context for this is 2.0. > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Werner, > > > > Konstantin is already listed as a potential Ruby client contributor for > > 2.0. > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/branches/2.0/classifiers/README?view=markup > > > > This list is non binding, its just being used for organizing 2.0. For a > > new client to be brought it, it needs to be written, pass the needed > > specification tests, the contributor needs to demonstrate they can > release > > and maintain said client, and finally the contributor and client needs to > > be voted in by the PMC (standard committer vote process). Im my opinion, > > this is how this should work. > > >
