http://s.apache.org/L57
Werner, I think you are the last person who should be lecturing this project regarding how versioning and support works. You have shown tremendous incompetence regarding all aspects of software dev, releasing, lifecycles, and this project as a whole. How you have made it this far in the industry is amazing... When it comes to decisions regarding how we support old versions and how we move onto better and greater things like JSON, I will use my own judgement and listen to the feedback from members of this project and people on the list. I have been writing, releasing, and supporting software through myself and many many companies and organizations for 15 years. I think I know what I am doing here and as an added plus, I know how to listen, accept feedback, and work as a team. If you want to control this project, start contributing in meaningful ways. Bossing people around, bickering and arguing with me at every chance you get, and spewing nonsense on this list accomplishes nothing. Otherwise, maybe just sit back and shut up for a few months? On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > Good to know. I don't recall he mentioned being subscribed to this mailing > list, but he would have to subscribe to post, I suppose. > > The current project (whether "device_map" was a legal name on GitHub or > not, I trust Bertrand can advise Konstantin) is based on the 1.0.x data, > and according to Travis CI makes a stable impression. With its Ruby gems it > is fairly self contained even if DeviceMap was to stop exposing 1.x via a > URL (the downloads are always there anyway) so I guess everyone involved > can figure out, if a 1.x "clients" contribution for Ruby makes sense or > wait for 2.x. > > Werner > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just for reference: > > > > http://s.apache.org/4ES > > > > Remember, the context for this is 2.0. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Werner, > > > > > > Konstantin is already listed as a potential Ruby client contributor for > > > 2.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/branches/2.0/classifiers/README?view=markup > > > > > > This list is non binding, its just being used for organizing 2.0. For a > > > new client to be brought it, it needs to be written, pass the needed > > > specification tests, the contributor needs to demonstrate they can > > release > > > and maintain said client, and finally the contributor and client needs > to > > > be voted in by the PMC (standard committer vote process). Im my > opinion, > > > this is how this should work. > > > > > >
