Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Graham Leggett wrote:
> > This brings a discussion as to where the "authoritative" source of data > > lies. Right now today that authoritative source is svn, and I also imagine > > people would want this to stay that way for some time. As a result, our > > first task would be to synchronise LDAP with the various members.txt (etc) > > files. This would need a bit of shell scripting, probably tied into the svn > > server so the synchronise is triggered on commit. > This is where the Use-Case descriptions are needed : they will exhibit > the data we will manipulate, plus the workflow we have to follow. > > This brings a potential ASF schema into the picture. > > objectclass: asfMember > > objectclass: asfCommitter > This has to be discussed, but we first have to analyze what data we > really need to handle. And there are a lot of them, in different files > and different formats ! No kidding! I'd really like to see a project objectclass, too. Especially for some of the things that we have in the Incubator. The redundant meta-data is really hurting. I want one canonical definition of a project, including reporting dates, PMC members, Committers, etc. --- Noel