Le 21/05/15 13:32, Shawn McKinney a écrit : >> On May 20, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I would say : fix whatever seems simple to fix. Low hanging fruits >> first, after of course critical and blocking issues. >> >> I have asked some creds to log on the tool to be able to tune some of >> the rules. >> >> We can discuss specific rules that seems a bit too strict, if needed. >> >> >> The value I see in such a tool is mainly about reviewing the code, which >> allows us to find some real and hidden issues, like the one on roles... > Most of the dependency cycles are fixed by moving the core's entities to > separate package. Easy to do, but breaks backward compatibility with > existing clients.
Don't do that. This warning is not really useful, considering that all the classes are in the same project. >From a OSGi PoV, this is not a problem either.
