Le 13/06/16 à 09:56, Radovan Semancik a écrit : > On 06/12/2016 12:55 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Le 12/06/16 à 10:41, Stefan Seelmann a écrit : >>> Thus my question, are there any blockers that must be fixed before >>> releasing API and Server? > > I'm OK with the release. All my tests with the API seems to be passing.
Ok, so I think we are good to go for a release of teh APi, ApacheDS and then Studio. We can start today. > >>> >>> I assume changes in the "value" branch are target for API 2.0.0 and >>> related issues won't make it into 1.0.0, right? >> Right. I eventually changed the version to 2.0.0 in the value branch. >>> I can take care of all the releases this week. >> There is one blocker : MINA. We have one big bug that need to be fixed, >> I do think that Radovan has a fix for it. I can work on that this >> afternoon or monay evening. > > Actually, I found a workaround to the file descriptor leak problem > which is explicitly closing all the connections (even those that were > already closed by the remote side). The downside is that the FDs will > not be disposed immediately after timeout, but they will be disposed > later when the client code has a chance to explicitly close the > connection. But I think this is quite acceptable. Therefore we do not > need any fixes to Mina (and I would prefer not to touch Mina 2 unless > absolutely necessary). Okie, thanks Radovan.
