Hi Eberhard, Le 08.09.2010 à 22:00, Eberhard Moenkeberg a écrit : > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Peter Pöml wrote: >> Le 08.09.2010 à 00:11, Eberhard Moenkeberg a écrit : > > Oh, francais. ;-))
Yeah, a strong faible lately ;-) >>> Peter, what are the mirrobrain scores for ftp3, ftp4, ftp5.gwdg.de? >>> I guess there is some "Luft" (air). [...] > ftp5 has 2 * 1 GBit with bonding, and 32 GB RAM. > ftp4 has 1 GBit, and 8 GB RAM. > ftp3 has 1 GBit, and 12 GB RAM. > > All three have far more net output than disk input, so the caches do their > job - but they are limited in size on ftp3 and ftp4. > > The middled output for today is: ftp3 15 MByte/sec, ftp4 8 MByte/sec, ftp5 > 100 MByte/sec. I kind of agree with Carsten, that there is not much to fine-tune, since everything is running so well. And I don't mean MirrorBrain with that (which just farms out the requests), but your mirrors, which do the hard work - you are doing an extremely good job. I can't remember when I ever heard a complaint. Happy users! Peter PS. download.services.openoffice.org merely has 0.5 GB of RAM :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
