I believe Greg is right, though the level of activity on the lists has shown that it doesn’t really seem to be necessary at this time. Almost all activity has been on the subdomain.
Matt Sicker > On Aug 31, 2021, at 22:21, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > > While I'm not subscribed to either list, I did see some of the turn-up of > the new committee while assisting Gris with the needed Foundation-y things. > With that: > > As I recall, diversity@ was intended as a public discussion forum. To include > non-Apache people. > > (and dev@ follows our typical pattern of getting-inside-work-done) > > Cheers, > -g > >> On 2021/08/31 12:24:45, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 13:19, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 8/31/21 8:10 AM, sebb wrote: >>>> As the subject says: what is the difference between >>>> >>>> [email protected] and [email protected] >>>> >>>> Are they both still needed or could diversity@ be shut down? >>> >>> Yes, I believe it can. I *think* that diversity@ predates the creation >>> of diversity.apache.org by several years. >> >> FTR: days/weeks, not years: >> >> diversity@ April 2, 2019 >> dev@diversity May 29, 2019 >> >>>> >>>> I think it makes more sense for all the lists to be under >>>> @diversity.a.o as there is also a private list under that domain. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>>> >>>> As it stands there is a danger of confusion and fragmenting discussions. >>>> >>>> Sebb >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rich Bowen - [email protected] >>> @rbowen >>
