The original idea behind keeping the two lists was to have one list for the philosophical discussions that were so "well-loved" at the time of that creation, and one list for the discussions about the actual work of monitoring diversity at Apache and proposing interventions.
People weren't very good at conforming to the intended pattern, and the philosophical discussions seem to have mostly died down. I don't think anyone will miss the loss of diversity@ now. Best, Myrle On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:17 AM Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > I am +0.8 on getting rid of diversity@ and keeping only dev@diversity. > > I see only one substantive discussion on diversity@ and don't see much > need to keep it. > > Craig > > > On Sep 2, 2021, at 5:08 PM, Katia Rojas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > What do you think about keeping only one list (dev@) for both purposes: > > > > public discussion forum, to include non-Apache people. > > > > and getting-inside-work-done > > > > Most of our communications/activity happen in dev@ and it is public. > > > > Thanks, > > Katia Rojas > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 at 05:43, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I believe Greg is right, though the level of activity on the lists has > >> shown that it doesn’t really seem to be necessary at this time. Almost > all > >> activity has been on the subdomain. > >> > >> Matt Sicker > >> > >>> On Aug 31, 2021, at 22:21, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> While I'm not subscribed to either list, I did see some of the turn-up > >> of the new committee while assisting Gris with the needed Foundation-y > >> things. With that: > >>> > >>> As I recall, diversity@ was intended as a public discussion forum. To > >> include non-Apache people. > >>> > >>> (and dev@ follows our typical pattern of getting-inside-work-done) > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> -g > >>> > >>>> On 2021/08/31 12:24:45, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 13:19, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 8/31/21 8:10 AM, sebb wrote: > >>>>>> As the subject says: what is the difference between > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [email protected] and [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are they both still needed or could diversity@ be shut down? > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, I believe it can. I *think* that diversity@ predates the > creation > >>>>> of diversity.apache.org by several years. > >>>> > >>>> FTR: days/weeks, not years: > >>>> > >>>> diversity@ April 2, 2019 > >>>> dev@diversity May 29, 2019 > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think it makes more sense for all the lists to be under > >>>>>> @diversity.a.o as there is also a private list under that domain. > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As it stands there is a danger of confusion and fragmenting > >> discussions. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sebb > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Rich Bowen - [email protected] > >>>>> @rbowen > >>>> > >> > > Craig L Russell > [email protected] > >
