On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 16:49 -0800, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > >> If it already formatted using > >> http://documentation.openoffice.org/files/documents/75/1817/OOoUSdocs_template.stw > >> > >> [...] > > > > Thanks for the quick response. From what you say should I infer that the > > Documentation Project mandates the use of the PDL and the use of an OOo > > 1.x template to enforce a house style? > > [...] > > > > As for the use of an OOo 1.x template, I have written my document(s) > > using 2.0.2rc1 and Open Document format and I also propose in the first > > instance to release the main document in PDF, until I see how useful it > > might be. The accompanying documents and template are also created under > > 2.0.2rc1. > > > > As I cannot download the house style template presently - the server is > > not responding - I am not able to comment on whether, or how quickly I > > can regress to the earlier format if that is indeed required, or desirable. > > Why not open the 1.x template and save it as an OTT, then build > your ODT document from there? That's what I would do. > > GRS, would that be a reasonable way for Peter to proceed? Maybe > we (I?) should make an OTT version of the template? >
Not really necessary. OOo2 will use the existing template with no problem. If you or Peter really need it in that format, please do what you want. For myself, I think it is a waste of time and effort to go through this exercise when it will work without problems in both incarnations of OOo. Knowing this, what do you think? -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
