On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 09:44 -0500, J David Eisenberg wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 09:36 -0500, Scott Carr wrote: > > > The instructions for that is still on the Templates area, and I am > > > wondering if it would be safe to move or remove them from the page so > > > there isn't any confusion with users. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > WHY? OOo 1.1.5 is still valid and 2.x can read and use the earlier > > format. Why remove stuff until it is completely obselete? > > > In fact, I can't use OOo 2.x to evangelize for OOo at my workplace, > because it needs administrative privileges to install. Instead, I set > people up with OOo 1.1.5 and tell them to install 2.x at home. >
I am glad you see my point and still have a need. You mention installation. Is this Windows of some description? I ask because I thought there was a way to get Windows to do this as you can with most of the *NIX releases. Do you work with a fileserver? If yes you would only need admin rights for the initial install. -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
