Hi Louis,
Louis Suarez-Potts schrieb:
André S. corrected it (some scorching involved--we both cite the same
issue, too) [0] and we returned to status quo ante. Except that I
think that there needs to be copyright info that is better than what
we have now but that we cannot retroactively determine the copyright
of existing material. The error of the previous language was that it
seemed to state that, though that was not my intention when I wrote it.
So, I'd be happy with posting something like, "Content posted after
[date] is licensed in accordance with OpenOffice.org's license policy,
which can be found at http://www.openoffice.org/license.html. Content
posted prior to this date is copyrighted Sun Microsystems and the
contributing authors."
I'd rather would not extend the OOo website licensing terms to the wiki
- see Jean's and DougT's comments. I second DougT - I'd love to see the
content under Public Domain. But we need to accept other (free)
licenses. So could we rephrase:
"Content posted after [date] is Public Domain as long as there is no
explicit license notice at a single wiki page. Content posted prior to
this date is copyrighted Sun Microsystems and the contributing authors."
Ok - someone needs to make English from that - and we need some clause
for countries where PD is not possible.
André
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
