Hi,
On 2007-04-04, at 17:02 , Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Frank Peters wrote:
I would second Andre in allowing wiki pages to specify a license
and have a default license for pages that do not specify the their
license.
That seems good to me, too... But I'd rather not allow for even
the possibility of proprietary licenses on the wiki, which the
wording suggested seems to permit, as does our current wording.
Ie, I want open licenses.
There is some stuff in, I think, Creative Commons licenses that
Jean would like to put on the wiki. Jean?
OOoAuthors work is currently licensed under CC-BY 2.5 or later
(we'll be progressively updating this to say 3.0 or later).
I was thinking of that license, too.
To allow for the possibility of this material being placed on the
wiki with minimal fuss, I request the Community Council to approve
this as an acceptable license for the wiki, at the same time as
they vote on the wording of the licensing proposal for the wiki.
Louis, I can send this as a separate CC agenda item if you wish.
Could you? Thanks.
--Jean
Best,
Louis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
