Jean,
these are all valid points. I think that keeping both versions
side-by-side is the best solution for now. As to the other
Guides (Dev and BASIC), I believe differences between versions
will be marked inside the text.
Also, I agree that we could remove the OOoAuthors from the User
Manual titles since there will be only one set of user guide: yours :-)
Frank
Do you have plans for how to structure the Documentation wiki pages to
include new user guides for OOo 3.0, separate from the 2.x guides? Here
are my thoughts on the subject.
IMO we'll need user guides for both OOo versions available for some
time, because not all our users will be moving to 3.0 immediately when
it is released.
The user guides for OOo 2.x are here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual
I suggest something like this would be suitable for the new release:
...wiki/Documentation/OOo 3.x User Guides
On the main ...wiki/Documentation page, the current section title could
be changed to "OOo 2.x User Guides (OOoAuthors)" and the new section
could go just below it, titled "OOo 3.x User Guides (OOoAuthors)".
I wonder if the "OOoAuthors" designation is needed or serves any useful
purpose. It means something to us (denoting the origin of the books) but
I'm sure it means nothing to users.
--Jean
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank Peters, Documentation Project Co-Lead
The OOo Documentation Project:
SIGN UP - PARTICIPATE - CONTRIBUTE
IT'S FREE! NO OBLIGATIONS!
http://documentation.openoffice.org
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
