I am sorry to hear that the low number of contributors of content is 
disappointing. I am sure that, as the software evolves, the documentation 
should adjust accordingly and that, having a healthy number of writers is 
desirable. So maybe Jean's question is an important one: Why have the numbers 
dwindled?

I am sure that the causes for this phenomenon are multiple: Adulthood comes 
with a growing number of responsibilities, the urgent takes precedence over the 
important, bureaucracy loves complicating simple things... maybe younger 
generations are not aware that a free software movement is a conquest... maybe 
there is an entry barrier that is driving people away. For example, during the 
production of a tutorial for Base in which I have been working I have 
discovered that there are very few sources of information (my may thanks to the 
oo.forum, in general and Drew Jensen in particular) and this text, that I could 
have written in three months, has taken me over a year and a half (and it's 
still not done!).

I recommend that we take a scientific approach to this and that we build a 
survey that could try to identify:

a) who are the people actively participating today (demographics like age, 
gender, occupation, etc.)
b) what drove the people to volunteer in the first place
c) How are they finding the experience, what has facilitated their work and 
what has been frustrating to them
d) Demographics of the people who are no longer participating
e) Reasons why they are no longer able to volunteer
f) How did they find their experience, what made their contribution easier and 
what was frustrating to them
g) Etcetera

This survey should be repeated at least once a year and historical data should 
be kept for comparisons. Info distilled form this data should allow the 
necessary tweaks to promote the longer and most fruitful cooperation possible.

If the number of signed contributors is really big, it could be necessary to 
formalize the survey with some kind of form (and Internet is great for this!) 
so that tabulation of data could be easier. This is turn would require an 
exploratory research (open questions) among a smaller (representative) sample 
in order to produce the appropriate categories for the formalized survey.

There is nothing wrong in wanting to know who we are, what do we want and what 
are we actually getting, if this can help us achieve a healthy number of active 
writers that would be helping spread the adoption and use of this great 
software.

Being a social scientist, I would be happy to help with this, but not before I 
finish the Base tutorial.

Mariano Casanova

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@documentation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@documentation.openoffice.org

Reply via email to