+1 (binding) I checked： [yes] Download links are valid [yes] Correct year in NOTICE file [yes] All source files have ASF headers [yes] LICENSE and NOTICE files exist [yes] All software licenses mentioned in LICENSE [yes] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
Lidong Dai <[email protected]> 于2022年3月5日周六 21:20写道： > > +1 > > I checked the following list, > 1. Download links are valid. > 2. LICENSE and NOTICE exists. > 3. all files have a license header. > 4. can compile from source > > > Best Regards > > > > --------------- > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC > Lidong Dai > [email protected] > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dailidong > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy <https://twitter.com/WorkflowEasy> > > --------------- > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:42 PM CalvinKirs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Change my vote to +1 (binding) > > > > I checked the following items. > > > > [v] LICENSE and NOTICE exist and contents are good > > [v] Tag and hash can match > > [v] Signature can be found in the keys file > > [v] Release notes look fine > > > > > > Since no files have been modified, we can resume on this thread. > > > > > > Best wishes！ > > Calvin Kirs > > > > > > On 03/3/2022 12:38，Jiajie Zhong<[email protected]> wrote： > > Hi Calvin, > > > > We decide to remove the directory `python` in release dist[1], also remove > > it from SVN. > > Because it lacks the LICNESE and NOTICE as you said. And do not release it > > separately > > this time > > > > We plan to fix this stuck and release it the next time. Thanks for your > > feedback. > > > > In this case, I think we should continue this vote thread. WDYT? > > > > ———— > > > > [1]: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/dolphinscheduler/2.0.5/ < > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/dolphinscheduler/2.0.5/> > > Cheers, > > — Jiajie Zhong -- DolphinScheduler PMC BaoLiang 鲍亮
