Hi wenjun, The size why so big of the repository dolphinscheduler-website it has all version of docs, with all website base in it.
But we only migrate the latest version of the document to repository dolphinscheduler. I think it would only be a litter space adding when we migrate in such a way. I would post the detailed plan about what would we do later before We actually do this. On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 10:28 PM Wenjun Ruan <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > This will be helpful for maintaining documentation. > > There is one thing that may need attention, right now the > dolphinscheduler-website repository is almost the same size as the > dolphinscheduler code repository. > This means after we merge these two repositories, the clone time will > become twice as larger, but this time is acceptable for me at the > moment. > > Thanks, > Wenjun > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:52 PM Lidong Dai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 I can't agree more > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > --------------- > > Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC > > Lidong Dai > > [email protected] > > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dailidong > > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy <https://twitter.com/WorkflowEasy> > > > > --------------- > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 11:52 AM Jiajie Zhong <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi ShunFeng, > > > > > > I think we should not merge pull requests when documents are lacking. > > > > > > IMO, source code, tests, docs are equally important. We do not merge > > > pull requests when tests missing or fail. So we also should not merge > > > pull requests missing docs or do not change related docs but they don't > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 11:24 AM ShunFeng Cai < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Great, then we can keep the code and doc consistent. > > > > BTW, do we limit merging pr if doc is needed but lacking? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Wish > > > > — Shunfeng > > > > > > > > Jiajie Zhong <[email protected]> 于2022年3月7日周一 19:30写道： > > > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > > > > > I proposal we should migrate our document from repo > > > > > dolphinscheduler-website[1] > > > > > to repo dolphinscheduler[2] for easier maintenance documentation. > > > > > > > > > > Currently we find out some of our documents is missing. And with > > > separate > > > > > repository, the missing documents would be much more when > developers > > > > > submit PR to [2] but for forget to submit PR for [1]. And we could > > > solve > > > > it > > > > > methodologically by migrate document repo[1] to main[2]. > > > > > > > > > > Months ago I had sent a discuss in mail thread[3]. But we did not > > > reach a > > > > > consensus. > > > > > But I hope this time we should be together and find out some way to > > > > migrate > > > > > docs to main repo[2] > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler-website > > > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler > > > > > [3]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1l2cwvrcmr4rq8dgjcd11rxv51b6wc48 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best Wish > > > > > — Jiajie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Wish > > > — Jiajie > > > > -- Best Wish — Jiajie
