Thanks Zihao prepare for this release. I tend to use `3.3.0-alpha-release`, since it is high probability that this release might have some serious problems in some feature. It would be better to announce it in the release, We can get more feedback and make it stable from user POC.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:00 PM Jay Chung <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Zihao bring this out and looking forward to the new minor release. > > I think 3.3.0(without 3.3.0-alpha) is ok for me, personally, if we consider > the **main function of our code to be stable** > > I have released version 3.0.0-alpha but is not happy with that. Not many > users for that version, and we have to continue releasing the 3.0.0 base on > 3.0.0-alpha. > For that example, I think the process from 3.0.0-alpha -> 3.0.0 is the same > as 3.0.0 -> 3.0.1, but the 'alpha' suffix ending will cause user distrust > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:11 AM SbloodyS <[email protected]> wrote: > > > sorry, I forgot to cc dev. > > > > > > -- > > Best Wishes > > ZiHao > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > 发件人： SbloodyS <[email protected]> > > Date: 2025年2月23日周日 10:55 > > Subject: Discussion of new version release > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > > > Hi community, > > > > It has been six months since the release of version 3.2.2. We plan > > to release the new version before March 30th. Because we have made great > > changes and reconstructions in the new version, there are also many > > incompatible changes. So our new version is called 3.3.0-release > according > > to the previous habit, or is it called 3.3.0-alpha-release? > > > > > > -- > > Best Wishes > > ZiHao > > > > > -- > Best Wish > —Jay Chung >
