Hi all, Thanks all for these opinions. I will use 3.3.0-alpha as the name of next version.
-- Best Wishes ZiHao Jay Chung <zhongjiajie...@gmail.com> 于2025年3月28日周五 00:20写道： > Hi all > > I change my opinion from 3.3.0 to 3.3.0-alpha according to Wenjun's > information. > > If we are not sure it is stable enough, we should use the alpha suffix and > let our users know about that. > > and what is your opinion I have not see that Zihao > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 7:51 PM David Zollo <davidzollo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Zihao for preparing for the new release. > > > > I think `3.3.0-alpha` is better, considering that there are too many > > changes in the architecture. > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > --------------- > > David > > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo > > Twitter: @WorkflowEasy <https://twitter.com/WorkflowEasy> > > --------------- > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:03 AM wenjun <wen...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Zihao prepare for this release. > > > I tend to use `3.3.0-alpha-release`, since it is high probability that > > this > > > release might have some serious problems in some feature. It would be > > > better to announce it in the release, > > > We can get more feedback and make it stable from user POC. > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:00 PM Jay Chung <zhongjiajie...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Zihao bring this out and looking forward to the new minor > > release. > > > > > > > > I think 3.3.0(without 3.3.0-alpha) is ok for me, personally, if we > > > consider > > > > the **main function of our code to be stable** > > > > > > > > I have released version 3.0.0-alpha but is not happy with that. Not > > many > > > > users for that version, and we have to continue releasing the 3.0.0 > > base > > > on > > > > 3.0.0-alpha. > > > > For that example, I think the process from 3.0.0-alpha -> 3.0.0 is > the > > > same > > > > as 3.0.0 -> 3.0.1, but the 'alpha' suffix ending will cause user > > distrust > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:11 AM SbloodyS <zihaoxi...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > sorry, I forgot to cc dev. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best Wishes > > > > > ZiHao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > > > 发件人： SbloodyS <zihaoxi...@apache.org> > > > > > Date: 2025年2月23日周日 10:55 > > > > > Subject: Discussion of new version release > > > > > To: <priv...@dolphinscheduler.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi community, > > > > > > > > > > It has been six months since the release of version 3.2.2. We plan > > > > > to release the new version before March 30th. Because we have made > > > great > > > > > changes and reconstructions in the new version, there are also many > > > > > incompatible changes. So our new version is called 3.3.0-release > > > > according > > > > > to the previous habit, or is it called 3.3.0-alpha-release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best Wishes > > > > > ZiHao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Wish > > > > —Jay Chung > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best Wish > —Jay Chung >
