>-----Original Message-----
>From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
>Sent: 23 July 2018 22:24
>To: Verma, Shally <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Athreya, Narayana Prasad
><[email protected]>; Challa,
>Mahipal <[email protected]>; Gupta, Ashish <[email protected]>;
>Sahu, Sunila <[email protected]>;
>Sahu, Sunila <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] compress/zlib: support burst
>enqueue/dequeue
>
>External Email
>
>On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 23:47:48 +0530
>Shally Verma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> -/** Parse comp xform and set private xform/stream parameters */
>> +/** Compute next mbuf in the list, assign data buffer and length,
>> + * returns 0 if mbuf is NULL
>> + */
>> +#define COMPUTE_BUF(mbuf, data, len) \
>> + ((mbuf = mbuf->next) ? \
>> + (data = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, uint8_t *)), \
>> + (len = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(mbuf)) : 0)
>> +
>
>Could this be an inline not a macro?
[Shally] Again what goes in favour of inline here? Just curious to know if DPDK
has any preferred guidelines regarding this?
Thanks
Shally
