On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:32:39 +0000
"Wiles, Keith" <keith.wi...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> > <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> > The code for set_interface_name was incorrectly assuming that
> > space for null byte was necessary with snprintf/strlcpy.
> >
> > Fixes: 02f96a0a82d1 ("net/tap: add TUN/TAP device PMD")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > index 1c00681ba0eb..d7f77d664502 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > @@ -1892,10 +1892,10 @@ set_interface_name(const char *key __rte_unused,
> > char *name = (char *)extra_args;
> >
> > if (value)
> > - strlcpy(name, value, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN - 1);
> > + strlcpy(name, value, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN);
> > else
> > - snprintf(name, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN - 1, "%s%d",
> > - DEFAULT_TAP_NAME, (tap_unit - 1));
> > + snprintf(name, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN, "%s%d",
> > + DEFAULT_TAP_NAME, tun_unit - 1);
>
> Was this meant to change from tap_unit to tun_unit here, if so why?
Accident. tun_unit disappears in later patch.
