On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:33:16PM +0000, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Van Haaren, Harry
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 11:33 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>; Pattan, Reshma
> > <reshma.pat...@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; olivier.m...@6wind.com;
> > tho...@monjalon.net; step...@networkplumber.org;
> > gavin...@arm.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix compile by making sched struct visible
> > 
> > Although C compilation works with the struct rte_mbuf_sched
> > declared inside the struct rte_mbuf namespace, C++ fails to
> > compile. This fix moves the rte_mbuf_sched struct up to the
> > global namespace, instead of declaring it inside the struct
> > mbuf namespace.
> > 
> > The struct rte_mbuf_sched is being used on the stack in
> > rte_mbuf_sched_get() and as a cast in _set(). For this
> > reason, it must be exposed as an available type.
> > 
> > Fixes: 5d3f72100904 ("mbuf: implement generic format for sched field")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > v3:
> >  - Update comment in mbuf to state size of struct sched (Crisitian)
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - Different solution, not applicable, v3 based on v1 (ML discussion)
> > 
> > Cc: reshma.pat...@intel.com
> > Cc: cristian.dumitre...@intel.com
> > Cc: olivier.m...@6wind.com
> > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net
> > Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
> > Cc: gavin...@arm.com
> > Cc: honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > index bc562dc8a..d53b68253 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > @@ -468,6 +468,17 @@ __extension__
> >  typedef uint64_t MARKER64[0]; /**< marker that allows us to overwrite 8
> > bytes
> >                                 * with a single assignment */
> > 
> > +struct rte_mbuf_sched {
> > +   uint32_t queue_id;   /**< Queue ID. */
> > +   uint8_t traffic_class;
> > +   /**< Traffic class ID. Traffic class 0
> > +    * is the highest priority traffic class.
> > +    */
> > +   uint8_t color;
> > +   /**< Color. @see enum rte_color.*/
> > +   uint16_t reserved;   /**< Reserved. */
> > +}; /**< Hierarchical scheduler */
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * The generic rte_mbuf, containing a packet mbuf.
> >   */
> > @@ -574,16 +585,8 @@ struct rte_mbuf {
> >                              * on PKT_RX_FDIR_* flag in ol_flags.
> >                              */
> >                     } fdir; /**< Filter identifier if FDIR enabled */
> > -                   struct rte_mbuf_sched {
> > -                           uint32_t queue_id;   /**< Queue ID. */
> > -                           uint8_t traffic_class;
> > -                           /**< Traffic class ID. Traffic class 0
> > -                            * is the highest priority traffic class.
> > -                            */
> > -                           uint8_t color;
> > -                           /**< Color. @see enum rte_color.*/
> > -                           uint16_t reserved;   /**< Reserved. */
> > -                   } sched; /**< Hierarchical scheduler */
> > +                   struct rte_mbuf_sched sched;
> > +                   /**< Hierarchical scheduler : 8 bytes */
> >                     struct {
> >                             uint32_t reserved1;
> >                             uint16_t reserved2;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> 
> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
> 
> Of course, final say belongs to Olivier, so Olivier please let un know your 
> vote.

Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>

Reply via email to