On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:26:34PM +0000, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Anoob Joseph > > Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2019 7:47 PM > > To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran > > <jer...@marvell.com> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com>; > > Nikhil Rao <nikhil....@intel.com>; Erik Gabriel Carrillo > > <erik.g.carri...@intel.com>; Abhinandan Gujjar > > <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>; > > Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Pablo de Lara > > <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya > > <pathr...@marvell.com>; Lukas Bartosik <lbarto...@marvell.com>; Pavan > > Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>; Hemant Agrawal > > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com>; Harry van > > Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>; Liang Ma <liang.j...@intel.com>; > > techbo...@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 00/39] adding eventmode helper > > library > > > > Hi Thomas, Jerin, > > > > Is there any consensus on how we should proceed? Can this be taken up by > > techboard? > > For me it make sense to move these helper functions to examples/.. and make > it as standalone(not as library) > Suggested directory(In the order of my preference). No strong preference on > the directory name though > 1) examples/helper or > 2) examples/common or > 3) examples/utils > > Thomas? Bruce? > No strong opinions. In terms of naming, "common" seems to be the usual (dare I say common) name used in DPDK for shared code resources such as this.
For what exactly is being proposed, is there a short version of the suggested approach and the logic behind it?
