> -----Original Message-----
> From: Van Haaren, Harry <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 7:58 PM
> To: Phil Yang <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ananyev,
> Konstantin <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <[email protected]>; Gavin Hu <[email protected]>;
> Ruifeng Wang <[email protected]>; Joyce Kong
> <[email protected]>; nd <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 07/12] service: remove rte prefix from static functions
> 
> > From: Phil Yang <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:18 AM
> > To: [email protected]; Van Haaren, Harry
> <[email protected]>;
> > Ananyev, Konstantin <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: [PATCH v3 07/12] service: remove rte prefix from static functions
> >
> > Fixes: 3cf5eb1546ed ("service: fix and refactor atomic service accesses")
> > Fixes: 21698354c832 ("service: introduce service cores concept")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> This patchset needs a rebase since the EAL file movement got merged,
> however I'll review here so we can include some Acks etc and make
> progress.
> 
> Is this really a "Fix"? The internal function names were not exported
> in the .map file, so are not part of public ABI. This is an internal
> naming improvement (thanks for doing cleanup), but I don't think the
> Fixes: tags make sense?
> 
> Also I'm not sure if we want to port this patch back to stable? Changing
> (internal) function names seems like unnecessary churn, and hence risk to a
> stable release, without any benefit?
OK.
I will remove these tags in the next version and split the service core patches 
from the original series into a series by itself.

Thanks,
Phil

> 
> ---
> 
> <snip patch diff>

Reply via email to