Hi David,
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 4:24 PM > To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <[email protected]> > Cc: dev <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona > <[email protected]>; > Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Doherty, Declan > <[email protected]>; Zhang, Roy Fan <[email protected]>; > Ananyev, Konstantin > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] doc: announce removal of crypto list > end enumerators > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arek Kusztal > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Enumerators RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_LIST_END, RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_LIST_END, > > RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_LIST_END will be removed to prevent some problems > > that may arise when adding new algorithms. > > How does it cohabitate with Ferruh notice? > Is it a complement? or redundant? > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst?id=58245da070289f4b248f15 > 970c3f8af73ea601ed > Thanks for drawing attention to this. It's complementary as far as I can see. Ferruh's doesn't list all enums - but doesn’t appear to cover these crypto ones.
