Sorry about that Thomas, Akhil, we should have chased up acks sooner. 

Given the proposed content of the patch, and the similar changes that are 
recommended and agreed
throughout DPDK do you think an exception can be made and that this change can 
get into 20.11 even
without the deprecation notice being in 20.08?
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 11:19 AM
> To: Dybkowski, AdamX <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; Zhang, Roy Fan 
> <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Burakov, Anatoly <[email protected]>; 
> [email protected];
> Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Richardson, Bruce 
> <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: scheduler API deprecation notice
> 
> 10/08/2020 11:47, Dybkowski, AdamX:
> > I see there are 3 ACKs: original (see the commit message) from Fan, then 
> > Thomas and Akhil.
> > This page: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=11317
> > also shows it has 3 ACKs.
> 
> Sorry I missed initial ack.
> 
> > Can I ask why it didn't go into 20.08 then?
> 
> Because it was completed late, I missed and nobody replied.
> 
> In general, I would like more support in last days of release,
> to avoid such miss.
> 
> 
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> > > 06/08/2020 19:18, Akhil Goyal:
> > > > > 27/07/2020 11:41, Adam Dybkowski:
> > > > > > This patch adds a deprecation notice about upcoming changes in
> > > > > > public API of the Scheduler PMD.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Acked-by: Fan Zhang <[email protected]>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > +* scheduler: The functions
> > > > > > +``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slave_attach``,
> > > > > > +  ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slave_detach`` and
> > > > > > +  ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slaves_get`` will be replaced in
> > > > > > +20.11 by
> > > > > > +  ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_worker_attach``,
> > > > > > +  ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_worker_detach`` and
> > > > > > +  ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_workers_get`` accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> > > > >
> > > > I wonder how this patch got missed.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Sorry it is missing an ack.
> 
> 

Reply via email to