12/08/2020 12:57, Hemant Agrawal: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: techboard <techboard-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Maxime > > Coquelin > > > > On 8/12/20 12:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 12/08/2020 11:52, Bruce Richardson: > > >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > >>> 10/08/2020 13:49, Trahe, Fiona: > > >>>> Sorry about that Thomas, Akhil, we should have chased up acks sooner. > > >>>> > > >>>> Given the proposed content of the patch, and the similar changes > > >>>> that are recommended and agreed throughout DPDK do you think an > > >>>> exception can be made and that this change can get into 20.11 even > > without the deprecation notice being in 20.08? > > >>> > > >>> That's a question for techboard. > > >>> > > >>> PS: please avoid top-posting > > >>> > > >> My initial 2c is that we should allow this, and add the required > > >> deprecation notice to the online docs immediately. I would assume > > >> most people use the online docs rather than building their own from > > >> the package, therefore adding in a deprecation notice to the online > > >> versions a few days after a release should not be a major problem IMHO. > > >> > > >> Also, given the fact that we have once-a-year at most to apply ABI > > >> changes, and this is the first time we are going this, so I think a > > >> little latitude should be given! :-) > > > > > > I agree > > > > > > We need more opinions from other techboard members to make it a > > decision. > > > > > > > > > > I agree too, let's give a bit more flexibility for the deprecation notice. > > > > Maxime > > +1 > Hemant
I've applied the patch after 20.11-rc0.
