Hi, haiyue

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 2:45 PM
> To: Guo, Jia <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>;
> Xing, Beilei <[email protected]>; Zhao1, Wei <[email protected]>;
> Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Zhang,
> Helin <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Yigit, Ferruh
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/5] fix vector rx burst for PMDs
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guo, Jia <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 14:37
> > To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Xing, Beilei
> > <[email protected]>; Zhao1, Wei <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z
> > <[email protected]>; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Richardson, Bruce <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Guo,
> > Jia <[email protected]>; Zhang, Helin <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>;
> > Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] fix vector rx burst for PMDs
> >
> > The limitation of burst size in vector rx was removed, since it should
> > retrieve as much received packets as possible. And also the scattered
> > receive path should use a wrapper function to achieve the goal of
> > burst maximizing.
> >
> > This patch set aims to maximize vector rx burst for for
> > ixgbe/i40e/ice/iavf/fm10k PMDs, and also do some code cleaning.
> 
> IMO, this can be "enhance the vector ...", but not "fix ...".
> If "fix", it needs "Fixes:" tags ... ;-)
> 

Ok, so I will prefer to use "refine the vector rx burst for PMDs", thanks.
> >
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> 

Reply via email to