> -----Original Message----- > From: Morten Brørup <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 15:43 > To: Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; Guo, Jia <[email protected]>; Yang, > Qiming > <[email protected]>; Xing, Beilei <[email protected]>; Zhao1, Wei > <[email protected]>; Zhang, > Qi Z <[email protected]>; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]> > Cc: Richardson, Bruce <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Zhang, > Helin <[email protected]>; > Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] fix vector rx burst for PMDs > > > From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wang, Haiyue > > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 9:05 AM > > > > > From: Guo, Jia <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 15:03 > > > > > > Hi, haiyue > > > > > > > From: Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 2:45 PM > > > > > > > > > From: Guo, Jia <[email protected]> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 14:37 > > > > > > > > > > The limitation of burst size in vector rx was removed, since it > > should > > > > > retrieve as much received packets as possible. And also the > > scattered > > > > > receive path should use a wrapper function to achieve the goal of > > > > > burst maximizing. > > > > > > > > > > This patch set aims to maximize vector rx burst for for > > > > > ixgbe/i40e/ice/iavf/fm10k PMDs, and also do some code cleaning. > > > > > > > > IMO, this can be "enhance the vector ...", but not "fix ...". > > > > If "fix", it needs "Fixes:" tags ... ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Ok, so I will prefer to use "refine the vector rx burst for PMDs", > > thanks. > > > > Better than "fix" now. > > > > It does fix a bug: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516
Looks like a backport is needed.
