Hi Thomas,

Ipn3ke is based on ifpga_bus, and all ethdevs created from ipn3ke are 
representors.
So it's no need to add RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE flags into ipn3ke driver.

Thanks,
Rosen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 6:16
> To: John W. Linville <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <[email protected]>; Shepard Siegel <[email protected]>;
> Ed Czeck <[email protected]>; John Miller
> <[email protected]>; Igor Russkikh
> <[email protected]>; Pavel Belous <[email protected]>;
> Matt Peters <[email protected]>; Rasesh Mody
> <[email protected]>; Shahed Shaikh <[email protected]>; Ajit
> Khaparde <[email protected]>; Somnath Kotur
> <[email protected]>; Chas Williams <[email protected]>; Rahul
> Lakkireddy <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal
> <[email protected]>; Marcin Wojtas <[email protected]>; Michal
> Krawczyk <[email protected]>; Guy Tzalik <[email protected]>; Evgeny
> Schemeilin <[email protected]>; Gagandeep Singh <[email protected]>;
> John Daley <[email protected]>; Hyong Youb Kim <[email protected]>;
> Gaetan Rivet <[email protected]>; Wang, Xiao W <[email protected]>;
> Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh
> <[email protected]>; Shijith Thotton <[email protected]>;
> Srisivasubramanian Srinivasan <[email protected]>; Matan Azrad
> <[email protected]>; Shahaf Shuler <[email protected]>; Zyta
> Szpak <[email protected]>; Liron Himi <[email protected]>; Stephen
> Hemminger <[email protected]>; K. Y. Srinivasan
> <[email protected]>; Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>; Jerin
> Jacob <[email protected]>; Richardson, Bruce
> <[email protected]>; Andrew Rybchenko
> <[email protected]>; Singh, Jasvinder
> <[email protected]>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <[email protected]>; Wiles, Keith <[email protected]>;
> Maciej Czekaj <[email protected]>; Maxime Coquelin
> <[email protected]>; Wang, Zhihong
> <[email protected]>; Yong Wang <[email protected]>;
> Burakov, Anatoly <[email protected]>; Xing, Beilei
> <[email protected]>; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> Cc: Xu, Rosen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Loftus, Ciara
> <[email protected]>; Steven Webster <[email protected]>;
> Somalapuram Amaranath <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Sachin Saxena <[email protected]>;
> Zhao1, Wei <[email protected]>; Guo, Jia <[email protected]>; Igor
> Chauskin <[email protected]>; Ziyang Xuan <[email protected]>;
> Xiaoyun Wang <[email protected]>; Guoyang Zhou
> <[email protected]>; Min Hu (Connor) <[email protected]>;
> Yisen Zhuang <[email protected]>; Alfredo Cardigliano
> <[email protected]>; Jakub Grajciar <[email protected]>; Viacheslav
> Ovsiienko <[email protected]>; Long Li <[email protected]>;
> Martin Spinler <[email protected]>; Heinrich Kuhn
> <[email protected]>; Harman Kalra <[email protected]>;
> Nithin Dabilpuram <[email protected]>; Kiran Kumar K
> <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Yigit,
> Ferruh <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of
> port
> 
> The patches for removing RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE are sent:
>       https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=12173
> 
> 11 drivers are not supporting the new behaviour correctly:
>       bnx2x, cxgbe, dpaa, dpaa2, enetc, ionic,
>       ipn3ke, liquidio, nfp, pfe, qede
> 
> If you are the maintainer of one of these drivers, you can still consider 
> fixing
> it in the next days.
> 
> 
> 12/09/2020 13:25, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 03/08/2020 20:50, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > 18/04/2019 12:59, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed
> > > > if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver:
> > > > port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on close.
> > > > This new behaviour is enabled per driver for a migration period.
> > > >
> > > > Looking at the code, you can see these comments:
> > > > /* old behaviour: only free queue arrays */ RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(DEBUG,
> > > > "Port closing is using an old behaviour.\n"
> > > >         "The driver %s should migrate to the new behaviour.\n",
> > > > /* new behaviour: send event + reset state + free all data */
> > > >
> > > > You can find an advice in the commit:
> > > >         http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=23ea57a2a
> > > > "
> > > > When enabling RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE, the PMD must free all
> its
> > > > private resources for the port, in its dev_close function.
> > > > It is advised to call the dev_close function in the remove
> > > > function in order to support removing a device without closing its 
> > > > ports.
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > It would be great to complete this migration for the next LTS
> > > > version, which will be 19.11.
> > >
> > > For the record, it did not happen in 19.11.
> > >
> > > > Following drivers should be migrated:
> > > > ( find drivers/net -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | cut -d/ -f3 ;
> > > > git grep -l RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE drivers | cut -d/ -f3 ) |
> > > > sort | uniq -u
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > The progress in April 2019 was 4 of 46 (9%).
> > >
> > > > Please let's progress smoothly on this topic, thanks.
> > >
> > > More than one year later, the progress is 26 of 53 (49%).
> > >
> > > > The concerned maintainers (Cc) can be found with the following
> command:
> > > > devtools/get-maintainer.sh $(( find drivers/net -mindepth 1
> > > > -maxdepth 1 -type d | cut -d/ -f-3 ; git grep -l
> > > > RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE drivers ) | sort | uniq -u)
> > >
> > > We cannot wait forever. Temporary cannot be longer than 2 years.
> > > I am going to send a deprecation notice to remove the "temporary"
> > > flag RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE.
> >
> > The deprecation notice was merged in 20.08:
> >     http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177314.html
> >
> > > It will break drivers which are not migrated.
> > > It will probably help to find motivation in new priorities.
> > >
> > > More details on what to do can be found in this mail thread:
> > >   http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/1748144.UFpUr2FPnr@xps/
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > * The freeing of private port resources must be moved in the PMD from
> > the ".remove(device)" function to the ".dev_close(port)" function.
> >
> > * If a generic resource (.mac_addrs or .hash_mac_addrs) cannot be
> > freed, it must be set to NULL in ".dev_close" PMD function to protect
> > from subsequent rte_eth_dev_release_port() freeing.
> >
> > * Note 1:
> > The generic resources are freed in rte_eth_dev_release_port(), after
> > ".dev_close" is called in rte_eth_dev_close(), but not when calling
> > ".dev_close" directly from the ".remove" PMD function.
> > That's why rte_eth_dev_release_port() must still be called explicitly
> > from ".remove(device)" after calling the ".dev_close" PMD function.
> >
> > * Note 2:
> > If a device can have multiple ports, the common resources must be
> > freed only in the ".remove(device)" function.
> >
> > * Note 3:
> > The port is supposed to be in a stopped state when it is closed.
> > If it is not the case, it is free to the PMD implementation how to
> > react when trying to close a non-stopped port:
> > either try to stop it automatically or just return an error.
> 
> 

Reply via email to