On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:08 AM Anatoly Burakov
<anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Liang Ma <liang.j...@intel.com>
>
> Add a simple API to allow getting the monitor conditions for
> power-optimized monitoring of the RX queues from the PMD, as well as
> release notes information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liang Ma <liang.j...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
> ---
<snip>
>  /**
>   * @internal A structure containing the functions exported by an Ethernet 
> driver.
>   */
> @@ -917,6 +937,8 @@ struct eth_dev_ops {
>         /**< Set up the connection between the pair of hairpin queues. */
>         eth_hairpin_queue_peer_unbind_t hairpin_queue_peer_unbind;
>         /**< Disconnect the hairpin queues of a pair from each other. */
> +       eth_get_monitor_addr_t get_monitor_addr;
> +       /**< Get next RX queue ring entry address. */
>  };
>

The implementation of get_monitor_addr will have much in common with
the rx_descriptor_status API in struct rte_eth_dev, including the property
that it will likely not make sense for it to be called concurrently with
rx_pkt_burst on a given queue. Might it make more sense to have this
API in struct rte_eth_dev instead of struct eth_dev_ops?

Reply via email to