On 19/1/2021 2:31 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
08/01/2021 15:30, David Hunt:
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
Move the 2 public functions into rte_power_guest_channel.h
[...]
+/**
+ * Send a message contained in pkt over the Virtio-Serial to the host endpoint.
+ *
+ * @param pkt
+ * Pointer to a populated struct channel_packet
+ *
+ * @param lcore_id
+ * lcore_id.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * - 0 on success.
+ * - Negative on error.
+ */
+int rte_power_guest_channel_send_msg(struct channel_packet *pkt,
+ unsigned int lcore_id);
+
+/**
+ * Receive a message contained in pkt over the Virtio-Serial
+ * from the host endpoint.
+ *
+ * @param pkt
+ * Pointer to channel_packet or
+ * channel_packet_freq_list struct.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_len
+ * Size of expected data packet.
+ *
+ * @param lcore_id
+ * lcore_id.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * - 0 on success.
+ * - Negative on error.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int
+rte_power_guest_channel_receive_msg(void *pkt,
+ size_t pkt_len,
+ unsigned int lcore_id);
Why only the second one is experimental?
Given the uncertainty of this API, I think it should be all experimental.
Yes Thomas, both should be experimental. I'll fix that in the next version.
Thanks,
Dave.
