I'd like to hope that's my methodology problem, but I just follow the installation guide without any customization.
Hi Mark, do you have any performance data share with us? Maybe we are using different type of workloads, like I mentioned I am using typical data center workload, I guess you are talking about NFV type of workload? Thanks, Jun Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 22, 2015, at 2:14 AM, Gray, Mark D <mark.d.gray at intel.com> wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jun >> Xiao >> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:01 PM >> To: discuss; dev >> Subject: [ovs-discuss] vswitches performance comparison >> >> After CloudNetEngine vswitch technical preview is launched, we received >> quite a few queries on vswitches performance comparison, but we cannot >> simply give a test result on our platform because performance varies on >> different H/Ws and different workloads, and that's why we encourage you to >> try the evaluation package to get real data on your setup. >> >> Anyway, we share a little more performance data on our H/W which is a >> comparison among native kernel OVS/OVS-DPDK/CNE vswitch under the >> most common workload: >> concurrent bi-directional TCP traffics cross hosts, and hope you can have a >> rough idea. >> http://www.cloudnetengine.com/weblog/2015/07/22/vswitches- >> performance-comparison/ > > I think there is an issue with you methodology. ovs-dpdk performance should be > significantly higher than kernel ovs. > >> >> Thanks, >> Jun >> _______________________________________________ >> discuss mailing list >> discuss at openvswitch.org >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
