> > I don't understand your point. > I am just proposing to allow some apps to explicitly include the shim > for their convenience in case they are fully based on DPDK and > understand the risk of conflict with some other code.
Agreed - there’s no harm in doing so. My point was simply that for a non-trivial application I suspect it will have limited value due to the sorts of conflicts that are likely to arise. Regards, Nick >
