31/03/2021 23:45, Nick Connolly: > > > > I don't understand your point. > > I am just proposing to allow some apps to explicitly include the shim > > for their convenience in case they are fully based on DPDK and > > understand the risk of conflict with some other code. > > > Agreed - there’s no harm in doing so. > > My point was simply that for a non-trivial application I suspect it will > have limited value due to the sorts of conflicts that are likely to arise.
OK yes. If we expose this header, we should bring it with a disclaimer.
