Hi Anatoly, On 7/4/2021 4:56 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
Previous fix has addressed the incorrect handling of `base_frequency` file, but has added a use-after-free error due to the fact that all further code paths will lead to an `fclose()` call at the end, so the additional `fclose()` call right after processing the file was unnecessary.Coverity issue: 369901 Fixes: 8a5febaac4f7 ("power: fix P-state base frequency handling") Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> --- lib/librte_power/power_pstate_cpufreq.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_power/power_pstate_cpufreq.c b/lib/librte_power/power_pstate_cpufreq.c index 1cb0e4d917..ec745153d3 100644 --- a/lib/librte_power/power_pstate_cpufreq.c +++ b/lib/librte_power/power_pstate_cpufreq.c @@ -220,7 +220,6 @@ power_init_for_setting_freq(struct pstate_power_info *pi)base_ratio = strtoul(buf_base, NULL, POWER_CONVERT_TO_DECIMAL)/ BUS_FREQ; - fclose(f_base); }/* Add MSR read to detect turbo status */
Yes, removing the fclose will do it. Either that or add an "f_base = NULL" after the fclose, but the fclose removal is fine.
Acked-by: David Hunt <david.h...@intel.com>
