On 5/24/2022 10:40 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 17-May-22 4:31 PM, Don Wallwork wrote:
Add support for using hugepages for worker lcore stack memory.  The
intent is to improve performance by reducing stack memory related TLB
misses and also by using memory local to the NUMA node of each lcore.

EAL option '--huge-worker-stack [stack-size-in-kbytes]' is added to allow
the feature to be enabled at runtime.  If the size is not specified,
the system pthread stack size will be used.

Signed-off-by: Don Wallwork <d...@xsightlabs.com>
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
---

<snip>

+++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ eal_long_options[] = {
      {OPT_TELEMETRY,         0, NULL, OPT_TELEMETRY_NUM },
      {OPT_NO_TELEMETRY,      0, NULL, OPT_NO_TELEMETRY_NUM },
      {OPT_FORCE_MAX_SIMD_BITWIDTH, 1, NULL, OPT_FORCE_MAX_SIMD_BITWIDTH_NUM},
+    {OPT_HUGE_WORKER_STACK, 2, NULL, OPT_HUGE_WORKER_STACK_NUM     },
        {0,                     0, NULL, 0                        }
  };
@@ -1618,6 +1619,28 @@ eal_parse_huge_unlink(const char *arg, struct hugepage_file_discipline *out)
      return -1;
  }
  +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS

Why the #ifdef-ery? This is common code, I think we can just leave it there? You could just add a check for `huge_worker_stack_size` in Windows EAL to guard against using this setting for Windows, but otherwise I see no need for an #ifdef here.


Was trying to follow the convention used in other cases, but I will post a new version that eliminates the ifdefs and checks huge_worker_stack_size in FreeBSD and Windows EAL.

Reply via email to