On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:20:38 +0200
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> On 6/7/22 17:44, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 5:43 AM
> >> To: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>; Chautru, Nicolas
> >> <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; gak...@marvell.com; t...@redhat.com;
> >> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.var...@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bbdev: add device status info
> >>
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> On 6/7/22 02:09, Stephen Hemminger wrote:  
> >>> On Mon,  6 Jun 2022 15:50:08 -0700
> >>> Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chau...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>> @@ -298,6 +313,8 @@ struct rte_bbdev_driver_info {
> >>>>          const struct rte_bbdev_op_cap *capabilities;
> >>>>          /** Device cpu_flag requirements */
> >>>>          const enum rte_cpu_flag_t *cpu_flag_reqs;
> >>>> +        /** Device Status */
> >>>> +        enum rte_bbdev_device_status device_status;
> >>>>    };
> >>>>  
> >>>
> >>> This ends up being an ABI breakage, can't change a struct like that
> >>> until 22.11 release.
> >>>  
> >>
> >> Indeed, but Nicolas mentioned in the cover-letter that the patch targets
> >> v22.11; not this release.
> >>
> >> However, a deprecation notice should be sent for v22.07 if it hasn't been
> >> done yet.  
> > 
> > I have sent this deprecation Maxime:
> > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1647542252-35727-2-git-send-email-nicolas.chau...@intel.com/
> > Do you believe this needs to be extended to cover more details the change 
> > and including this device status info explicitly? I can update the verbiage 
> > in more details if required  
> 
> Thanks for the pointer, I missed it.
> Reading the deprecation notice, it is not clear to me it is about the
> device status info enum.
> 
> Maybe rewording it a bit to be more specific would help.

You might want to use one the existing empty padding slots (holes) in
that structure. It appears to have been laid out haphazardly.


Reply via email to