Hello all, On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote: > 2016-07-11 13:33, Yuanhan Liu: >> I'm not quite sure I understood it well: are you asking us to resend >> what David has already send, say me for resending the virtio part? >> >> If so, what's the point of that? What's worse, it's likely to fail >> apply (due to conflicts), as every one of us make a patch based on >> the same base while touching some same files. > > Good point. > There were some changes since the patches from David (and a new bnxt). > That's why I was thinking to ask maintainers to take care of this change. > But maybe it's better to do the change in one patchset. > David, ok to refresh these patches?
Now that we have a modinfo-like infra and the test code is exempt from igb pci ids, all that remains (to fully get rid of this header) are bypass api and kni/ethtool. So the deal with Thomas is that I refresh those patches letting igb and ixgbe pmd as is. Will send this later. -- David Marchand
