I think, we should consider to move it to somebody else. I would work on it, however, I don't see all the tasks that are to be done. That's why I was waiting to finalize those patchs by David or Thomas. For me, the important things were to generalize certain things to remove dependency on PCI. This is mostly done (otherwise the SoC patchset couldn't be done in the way I've posted it).
Now, there is some pending work to remove pmd_type. Next, to find out some generalization of rte_pci_device/driver to create rte_device/driver (I've posted several suggestions in the 0000 of SoC patchset). What more? Jan?Viktorin RehiveTech Sent?from?a?mobile?device ? P?vodn? zpr?va ? Od: Thomas Monjalon Odesl?no: ?tvrtek, 16. ?ervna 2016 9:34 Komu: Shreyansh Jain Kopie: David Marchand; viktorin at rehivetech.com; dev at dpdk.org; Iremonger, Bernard P?edm?t: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/17] prepare for rte_device / rte_driver 2016-06-16 06:32, Shreyansh Jain: > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iremonger, Bernard > > Patches 3,8,16 and 17 no longer apply to the latest master branch. > > A rebase is needed. > > With the recent most head (04920e6): 01, 03, 08, 15, 16 and 17 are failing. > > Just wanted to check if there is a rebase of this series anytime soon? I will take care of this series if time permit. It would help to have more reviews on other series touching EAL, like pmdinfo. > I was looking at Jan's non-PCI patchset [1] and they are based on this series. > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/30913/focus=38486
