Hi John, > -----Original Message----- > From: Mcnamara, John > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 11:41 PM > To: Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.y...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Yang, Zhiyong > <zhiyong.y...@intel.com>; Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] doc: update port id type > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang > > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 2:17 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Yang, Zhiyong > > <zhiyong.y...@intel.com> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] doc: update port id type > > > > Since port id has changed from uint8_t to uint16_t in dpdk code, So > > update the change in related doc. > > > > Fixes: f8244c6399d9 ("ethdev: increase port id range") > > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.y...@intel.com> > > Looks good. There is one other unchanged reference but I don't know if it is > relevant. > > CC: Harry > > $ ag "uint8_t port" doc/guides/ > doc/guides/prog_guide/eventdev.rst > 283: uint8_t port_id = 0; > > > Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
Thanks for your acked-by firstly. The patchset increased port id range to uint16_t in ethdev, Not eventdev. So I don't touch it here. Port id in eventdev is stills uint8_t from my understanding. Thanks Zhiyong
