06/02/2018 10:28, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 05-Feb-18 10:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 05/02/2018 18:39, Burakov, Anatoly: > >> On 05-Feb-18 4:37 PM, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > >>> During lcore scan, find maximum socket ID and store it. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> > >>> --- > >>> > >>> Notes: > >>> v3: > >>> - Added ABI backwards compatibility > >>> > >>> v2: > >>> - checkpatch changes > >>> - check socket before deciding if the core is not to be used > >>> > >>> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c | 37 > >>> +++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_lcore.h | 8 +++++++ > >>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++- > >>> lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map | 9 +++++++- > >>> 5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > >>> > >> > >> This patch does not break ABI, but does it in a very ugly way. Is it > >> worth it? > > > > I think we agreed to not get this patch in 18.02. > > Did you change your mind? > > > > Sorry, how do i mark this patch as for 18.05? Is it a patch header?
So your answer is "yes, it is for 18.05" :) Next time, you could add 18.05 near "PATCH v3", or say it in annotations.