You are welcome, Jacques.

Vick*y *:)

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> wrote:

> I just realized that we didn't merge the broken profile patch (thanks
> Vicki). We should get it merged as well.
>
> DRILL-4384
>
> --
> Jacques Nadeau
> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Jason Altekruse <altekruseja...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I should have merged this sooner but we will need this patch that I had
> > applied to the 1.5 release branch. The change is small and fixes a build
> > problem that only appears when running the maven release profile.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/402
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > I think patch for DRILL-2517 has been merged to the apache master
> > > branch. Have you tried your query on the latest master branch?
> > >
> > > In DRILL-2517, I posted some performance number for 117k small parquet
> > > files. The patch did show improvement.
> > >
> > > Before DRILL-3996 is resolved, for now if your query relies on filter
> > > pushdown logic to push partitioning filter first, then the patch for
> > > DRILL-2517 will not help.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:23 AM, John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> wrote:
> > > > I'd like to request drill-2517 be added as a bandaid for the planning
> > > > issues when there are lots of directories of parquet files.   This
> > issue
> > > is
> > > > really hurting drill adoption for me in my org.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,  John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, March 1, 2016, Edmon Begoli <ebeg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> May I please ask to give this issue the attention for 1.6:
> > > >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/DRILL-3149
> > > >>
> > > >> I will try to suggest a patch. Given my time constraints I might not
> > be
> > > >> able to submit a complete, unit tested code but at I least I will
> try
> > to
> > > >> submit a snippet that will help with fixing it up (I think we just
> > need
> > > to
> > > >> do a look ahead byte lookup to ensure that it is not \r\n.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tuesday, March 1, 2016, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com
> > > >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > It seems like a stretch to include DRILL-3623 right before the
> > > release.
> > > >> > This is a pretty fundamental change that seems like it should soak
> > > for a
> > > >> > bit of time before we release. If we want to include, I'd suggest
> > > that we
> > > >> > disable the functionality by default and consider it experimental.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'll propose a few other patches for inclusion shortly.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Jacques Nadeau
> > > >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org
> > > >> <javascript:;>
> > > >> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hello everyone,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   It's time to start looking into the 1.6 release.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   Can all the folks working on open issues let me know if there
> > are
> > > any
> > > >> > > JIRAs you would like to get into the release?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   I know of the following -
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *DRILL-4281 *- Drill should support inbound impersonation. Pull
> > > request
> > > >> > > expected today. C++ client to be tested.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *DRILL-4372* - Drill Operators and Functions should correctly
> > expose
> > > >> > their
> > > >> > > types within Calcite. Waiting for review.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *DRILL-3623* - Limit 0 should avoid execution when querying a
> > known
> > > >> > schema.
> > > >> > > Pull request expected today. Need to add limitations of current
> > > impl to
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > JIRA. Review needed.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *DRILL-4313* - Improved client randomization. Update JIRA with
> > > warnings
> > > >> > > about using the feature. Waiting for review.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Parth
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sent from my iThing
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to