Github user paul-rogers commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/796#discussion_r108049374 --- Diff: exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/dfs/DrillFileSystem.java --- @@ -89,22 +89,36 @@ public DrillFileSystem(Configuration fsConf) throws IOException { } public DrillFileSystem(Configuration fsConf, OperatorStats operatorStats) throws IOException { - this.underlyingFs = FileSystem.get(fsConf); + this(fsConf, URI.create(fsConf.getRaw(FS_DEFAULT_NAME_KEY)), operatorStats); + } + + public DrillFileSystem(Configuration fsConf, URI Uri, OperatorStats operatorStats) throws IOException { + this.underlyingFs = FileSystem.get(Uri, fsConf); + logger.trace("Configuration for the DrillFileSystem " + fsConf.getRaw(FS_DEFAULT_NAME_KEY) + + ", underlyingFs: " + this.underlyingFs.getUri()); this.codecFactory = new CompressionCodecFactory(fsConf); this.operatorStats = operatorStats; + setConf(fsConf); --- End diff -- I think this whole code block needs more thought. DrillFileSystem derives from the Hadoop `FileSystem` class, but we never invoke the `FileSystem` constructor. Why? Without proper init, can we guarantee that the methods defined in the base class actually work? On the other hand, it seems we've reimplemented all base class methods, basically masking the base class implementation. If that is true, why set the config on the base class?
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---