Thank you Parth, Any agreement with developers will be private but we will make sure to contribute any improvements we may sponsor to the community.
Developers: please contact me directly on [email protected] should you wish to participate. Regards, -Stefán On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Parth Chandra <[email protected]> wrote: > Others may disagree, but I see no reason why you should not be allowed to > approach contributors to work on specific items of interest to you. It is > the reality that programmers have to pay bills too :). > > As long as any posts you make on the dev list are made with the goal of > improvement to Drill I'm sure it will be acceptable. Of course please keep > any agreement you have with developers, private and off the list. > > Parth > > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Stefán Baxter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We are, unfortunately, still not in a position to contribute time to > Drill > > development despite using it heavily and liking it a lot. > > > > We are, however, in a position to commission work for it to be > contributed > > is there are any developers here that would accept that kind of work and > if > > this practice is a acceptable by the Drill community. > > > > There are several things we would love to see happen and are willing to > > commission/sponsor over the next few months. > > > > To name one, as an example, we would benefit from predicate push-down for > > dictionary values (other than the statistical max/min values currently > > supported (from 1.9)). > > > > If this approach is not welcome then I apologize. > > > > Regards, > > - Stefán Baxter (ActivityStream.com) > > >
