Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the Apache master.
The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run the functional tests if doing a batch commit. Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkha...@mapr.com> wrote: > For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of the > meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an absentee. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:par...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM > To: dev <dev@drill.apache.org> > Subject: Re: gitbox? > > Bumping this thread up. > > Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would like > to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations! > > Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion. > > I'm +1 on moving to gitbox. > > Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process document. > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" ( > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" ( > > https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community, but > > from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider migrating > > Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give committers write > > access to the Drill repository on Github with all the perks that Github > provides. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Vlad > > >
