Ok, I was hoping that some of the PRs could be merged, but if we are in agreement, let's start the work :)
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:52 PM luoc <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Charles, > All right, we'll be expecting the update. > > > 2021年5月24日 上午12:13，Charles Givre <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > Hi Luoc, > > We still have a few PRs pending that we really should get into Drill > 1.19. The main one is the junit upgrade. There are a few critical CVEs > associated with that, so I do think it is important to get that one > merged. I think Vitalii will have that one done in short order. > > Best, > > -- C > > > > > > > >> On May 22, 2021, at 5:16 AM, luoc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Laurent, > >> It’s time to do a release with 1.19.0. > >> > >>> 2021年5月19日 上午2:20，Vitalii Diravka <[email protected]> 写道： > >>> > >>> Hi Laurent, > >>> DRILL-7871 requires additional time to be introduced and it is better > to > >>> include it for the next release. > >>> DRILL-7904 is updated, I think it will be merged in a few days. But it > >>> doesn't matter whether it is included in this release or in the next > one. > >>> > >>> So we can plan to start the release process > >>> > >>> > >>> Kind regards > >>> Vitalii > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:52 PM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Thanks Vitalii > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:29 AM Vitalii Diravka <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Luoc! > >>>>> > >>>>> They are almost ready. I plan to update PR for them today. > >>>>> > >>>>> Kind regards > >>>>> Vitalii > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 5:26 PM luoc <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Vitalii, > >>>>>> Would you mind sharing that... Is DRILL-7904 ready to review again? > >>>>> And what’s > >>>>>> the status on the DRILL-7871? thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2021年5月4日 下午1:10，Ted Dunning <[email protected]> 写道： > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Laurent, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't have a stake here, so can't really comment about specifics, > but > >>>>> the > >>>>>> process is looking good. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:23 PM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks for all the answers > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So the issues I found based on the feedback are: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7878: Fix LGTM Alerts > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7878> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7871: StoragePluginStore instances for different users > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7908: Fix GitHub Actions CI > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7904: Update to 30-jre Guava version > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7826: Merge Pcap and Pcapng format plugin based on EVF > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7826> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7828: Refactor Pcap and Pcapng format plugin > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7910: Bumps commons-io from 2.4 to 2.7 > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7910> > >>>>>> - DRILL-7901: Bump junit from 4.12 to 4.13.1 > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7901> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I wanted to propose Monday May 10th to do the first release > candidate, > >>>>> but > >>>>>> I have some concerns about some of the changes which may not be > ready > >>>> by > >>>>>> then considering they seem to involve some level of effort and are > in > >>>>> very > >>>>>> early stage: The LGTM alert changes and the StoragePluginStore model > >>>>>> change. JUnit version update might also become quite a large change > if > >>>>>> instead of moving to 4.13.1, Drill is switching to JUnit5. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do people think? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 1:00 PM Vitalii Diravka <[email protected] > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Laurent, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I want to include: > >>>>>> DRILL-7871 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7871> > >>>> (preparing > >>>>>> PR) > >>>>>> DRILL-7908 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7908> > >>>> (preparing > >>>>>> PR) > >>>>>> DRILL-7904 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7904> (PR > is > >>>>>> opened, in review) > >>>>>> DRILL-7828 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7828> (PR > is > >>>>>> opened, review is almost completed) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> All these tasks are expected to be completed in a week > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kind regards > >>>>>> Vitalii > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:25 PM Charles Givre <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Laurent, > >>>>>> We have a few PRs pending which I'd like to see in the next version > >>>>>> > >>>>>> which > >>>>>> > >>>>>> are: > >>>>>> 1. The update(s) and bug fixes to the Mongo plugin. > >>>>>> 2. There is an extended PR for bug fixes which clean up a lot of > >>>>>> > >>>>>> alerts > >>>>>> > >>>>>> generated by LGTM > >>>>>> 3. There are a few other library updates which are pending. > >>>>>> 4. We have some work which changes the access model around storage > >>>>>> plugins which would be good for this release > >>>>>> 5. The PCAP/PCAP-NG consolidation is awaiting review. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think that's it. > >>>>>> -- C > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 22, 2021, at 12:33 PM, Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello everyone, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It has been more than 6 months since the last release, and I believe > >>>>>> > >>>>>> this > >>>>>> > >>>>>> would be a good time to discuss the next one. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As mentioned in a previous email thread, I am volunteering to be the > >>>>>> release manager, and I'm looking forward working with the whole > >>>>>> > >>>>>> community > >>>>>> > >>>>>> to make another great release. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We have around 80 changes in master since the last release, and > there > >>>>>> > >>>>>> are > >>>>>> > >>>>>> several changes open for review too. It would be nice if people > could > >>>>>> > >>>>>> reply > >>>>>> > >>>>>> to this email and share issues which should be part of that release, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> so > >>>>>> > >>>>>> we > >>>>>> > >>>>>> can decide on an initial cut-off date. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Laurent > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >
