I think it couldn't hurt. I am not sure if it's necessary. I believe that in general, Apache doesn't require CLAs for patches submitted by non-committers, as long as they are submitted by the author and with clear intent to contribute.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:09 PM Pierre-Emile Ferron <pefer...@gmail.com> wrote: > For corporate contributors, if we already signed the old corporate CLA, > will we need to sign again but with the Apache CLA at > https://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt ? > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I think since the source is migrated now, what sounds right to me is to > > accept Apache CLAs/SGAs for new committers, corporate contributors, and > > major code transfers (like any other Apache project). And I think we > > probably don't need to keep collecting our old CLAs, especially not for > > minor contributions. Happy to get input from other people on this as it > is > > not my area of expertise. > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 5:09 PM Jonathan Wei <jon...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Now that we've migrated the sources (but are still incubating), should > we > > > still ask new contributors to sign http://druid.io/community/cla.html? > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Yes we are still collecting them, although once we are fully migrated > > to > > > > ASF, then we won't anymore (as per ASF policy - as I understand it - > > CLAs > > > > are only required for committers). > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Pierre Lacave <p.lac...@criteo.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > With the incubation ongoing, do you still require CLA signed for > > > > > contributions? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
