Hi,

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Yong Zhu <diecui1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> As discussing before, we could start this in master(2.7.x) now.
>
> The previous discuss thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a981ec4fc34db42a246a83aa4a8ec9eaedd9322f94403788cac60898@%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E
>
> Now, there also have 23 PRs under reviewing, we need to fix them first,
> merge or close it. Then we rename the package ASAP.
>
> After that, new PRs with bugfix need to be merged into 2.6.x and master,
> other PRs with big changes or new feature only need to be merged into
> master.
>
> How do you guys think?

I think it is ok if there is still remaining PRs while doing the rename work.

For the remaining PRs, we can:
1. comments on them so that they are aware of that
2. ask them to re-send the PR after package rename
3. if they don't respond,  we can do it manually, this may cause extra
work, but IMO won't be too much. If the pull request does not pass the
review, we can just close it.


Note that some of the pull request may not be affected by the package
renaming work if they are minor changes.

>
> Best regards,
> Jerrick



-- 
Best Regards!
Huxing

Reply via email to